Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563402›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2025

Preparing for downstream tasks in artificial intelligence for dental radiology: a baseline performance comparison of deep learning models.

Fara A Fernandes, Mouzhi Ge, Georgi Chaltikyan, Martin W Gerdes, Christian W Omlin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Transformer-based models in dentistry: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fara A FernandesDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder (UiA), 4879 Grimstad, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8522-5166
Mouzhi GeFaculty European Campus Rottal-Inn, Deggendorf Institute of Technology (DIT), 84347 Pfarrkirchen, Germany.
Georgi ChaltikyanFaculty European Campus Rottal-Inn, Deggendorf Institute of Technology (DIT), 84347 Pfarrkirchen, Germany.
Martin W GerdesDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder (UiA), 4879 Grimstad, Norway.
Christian W OmlinDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder (UiA), 4879 Grimstad, Norway.

Funding

University of Agder
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the performance of the convolutional neural network (CNN) with the vision transformer (ViT), and the gated multilayer perceptron (gMLP) in the classification of radiographic images of dental structures.

methodsRetrospectively collected two-dimensional images derived from cone beam computed tomographic volumes were used to train CNN, ViT, and gMLP architectures as classifiers for four different cases. Cases selected for training the architectures were the classification of the radiographic appearance of maxillary sinuses, maxillary and mandibular incisors, the presence or absence of the mental foramen, and the positional relationship of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar nerve canal. The performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and f1-score) and area under the curve (AUC)-receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves were calculated.

resultsThe ViT with an accuracy of 0.74-0.98, performed on par with the CNN model (accuracy 0.71-0.99) in all tasks. The gMLP displayed marginally lower performance (accuracy 0.65-0.98) as compared to the CNN and ViT. For certain tasks, the ViT outperformed the CNN. The AUCs ranged from 0.77 to 1.00 (CNN), 0.80 to 1.00 (ViT), and 0.73 to 1.00 (gMLP) for all of the four cases.

conclusionsThe ViT and gMLP exhibited comparable performance with the CNN (the current state-of-the-art). However, for certain tasks, there was a significant difference in the performance of the ViT and gMLP when compared to the CNN. This difference in model performance for various tasks proves that the capabilities of different architectures may be leveraged.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningRadiography, DentalHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studiesconvolutional neural networkdental radiologygated multilayer perceptronperformance metricsvision transformer

Identifiers

PMID39563402
PMCPMC11784916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.