ArticleGlobal health research and policy2024
How the U.S. presidential election impacts global health: governance, funding, and beyond.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A decision-tree model to evaluate the impacts of workforce investments aimed at strengthening emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) facilities in Burundi.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- The successful scaling-up of antiretroviral therapy globally has many lessons for advancing universal health coverage: progress at risk.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Global partnerships in combating tropical diseases: assessing the impact of a U.S. withdrawal from the WHO.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Review
- The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United States plays a crucial role in shaping global health through its policy decisions and engagements. Historically, bipartisan support underpinned U.S. involvement in multilateral and bilateral global health initiatives in advancing its national health, security interests, and foreign policy. However, recent decades have witnessed increased politicization and polarization of global health and fluctuating stances between Republican and Democratic administrations. This commentary speculates the potential implications of the 2024 presidential election on global health, focusing on how ideological differences between parties and previous administrative actions might affect U.S.'s strategies in addressing key global health issues, including governance, funding allocation, sexual and reproductive health policies, responses to humanitarian crises, and efforts to combat climate change. The election may be a critical juncture that could determine whether the U.S. global health strategies will continue to reflect the globalist and liberal policies typically associated with recent Democratic administrations or shift back to the isolationist tendencies observed during Trump's presidency. The outcome will significantly determine the direction of U.S. global health policy and its broader implications for global health equity and security. The conclusions emphasize the necessity of maintaining strong international cooperation and commitment to health as a global public good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.