Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563368›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Explainable predictions of a machine learning model to forecast the postoperative length of stay for severe patients: machine learning model development and evaluation.

Ha Na Cho, Imjin Ahn, Hansle Gwon, Hee Jun Kang, Yunha Kim, Hyeram Seo, Heejung Choi, Minkyoung Kim, Jiye Han, Gaeun Kee and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ha Na ChoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43Gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Imjin AhnDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hansle GwonDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jun KangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43Gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Yunha KimDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeram SeoDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heejung ChoiDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minkyoung KimDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiye HanDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43 Gil, Sonpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gaeun KeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43Gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Seohyun ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43Gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Tae Joon Jun *Big Data Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43Gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. taejoon@amc.seoul.kr.
Young-Hak Kim *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43Gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the length of stay in advance will not only benefit the hospitals both clinically and financially but enable healthcare providers to better decision-making for improved quality of care. More importantly, understanding the length of stay of severe patients who require general anesthesia is key to enhancing health outcomes.

objectiveHere, we aim to discover how machine learning can support resource allocation management and decision-making resulting from the length of stay prediction.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2018 to October 2020. A total cohort of 240,000 patients' medical records was collected. The data were collected exclusively for preoperative variables to accurately analyze the predictive factors impacting the postoperative length of stay. The main outcome of this study is an analysis of the length of stay (in days) after surgery until discharge. The prediction was performed with ridge regression, random forest, XGBoost, and multi-layer perceptron neural network models.

resultsThe XGBoost resulted in the best performance with an average error within 3 days. Moreover, we explain each feature's contribution over the XGBoost model and further display distinct predictors affecting the overall prediction outcome at the patient level. The risk factors that most importantly contributed to the stay after surgery were as follows: a direct bilirubin laboratory test, department change, calcium chloride medication, gender, and diagnosis with the removal of other organs. Our results suggest that healthcare providers take into account the risk factors such as the laboratory blood test, distributing patients, and the medication prescribed prior to the surgery.

conclusionWe successfully predicted the length of stay after surgery and provide explainable models with supporting analyses. In summary, we demonstrate the interpretation with the XGBoost model presenting insights on preoperative features and defining higher risk predictors to the length of stay outcome. Our development in explainable models supports the current in-depth knowledge for the future length of stay prediction on electronic medical records that aids the decision-making and facilitation of the operation department.

Indexed as

Length of StayMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesDecision support systemHealthcare managementMachine learningPredictive analysis

Identifiers

PMID39563368
PMCPMC11577810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.