Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563355›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Anomaly-based threat detection in smart health using machine learning.

Muntaha Tabassum, Saba Mahmood, Amal Bukhari, Bader Alshemaimri, Ali Daud, Fatima Khalique

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aging With Artificial Intelligence: How Technology Enhances Older Adults' Health and Independence.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muntaha Tabassum *Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Saba Mahmood *Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan. smahmood.buic@bahria.edu.pk.
Amal Bukhari *Department of Information Systems and Technology, Collage of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Bader Alshemaimri *Software Engineering Department, College of Computing and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Daud *Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. alimsdb@gmail.com.
Fatima Khalique *Centre of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence COE-AI, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnomaly detection is crucial in healthcare data due to challenges associated with the integration of smart technologies and healthcare. Anomaly in electronic health record can be associated with an insider trying to access and manipulate the data. This article focuses around the anomalies under different contexts. METHODOLOGY: This research has proposed methodology to secure Electronic Health Records (EHRs) within a complex environment. We have employed a systematic approach encompassing data preprocessing, labeling, modeling, and evaluation. Anomalies are not labelled thus a mechanism is required that predicts them with greater accuracy and less false positive results. This research utilized unsupervised machine learning algorithms that includes Isolation Forest and Local Outlier Factor clustering algorithms. By calculating anomaly scores and validating clustering through metrics like the Silhouette Score and Dunn Score, we enhanced the capacity to secure sensitive healthcare data evolving digital threats. Three variations of Isolation Forest (IForest)models (SVM, Decision Tree, and Random Forest) and three variations of Local Outlier Factor (LOF) models (SVM, Decision Tree, and Random Forest) are evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score.

resultsIsolation Forest SVM achieves the highest accuracy of 99.21%, high sensitivity (99.75%) and specificity (99.32%), and a commendable F1 Score of 98.72%. The Isolation Forest Decision Tree also performs well with an accuracy of 98.92% and an F1 Score of 99.35%. However, the Isolation Forest Random Forest exhibits lower specificity (72.84%) than the other models.

conclusionThe experimental results reveal that Isolation Forest SVM emerges as the top performer showcasing the effectiveness of these models in anomaly detection tasks. The proposed methodology utilizing isolation forest and SVM produced better results by detecting anomalies with less false positives in this specific EHR of a hospital in North England. Furthermore the proposal is also able to identify new contextual anomalies that were not identified in the baseline methodology.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningComputer SecurityHumansSupport Vector MachineUnsupervised Machine LearningAnomaly detectionElectronic Health Records(EHRs)HealthcareInsider threatsMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39563355
PMCPMC11577804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.