Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563335›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care.

Ann-Therese Hedqvist, Catharina Lindberg, Heidi Hagerman, Ann Svensson, Mirjam Ekstedt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann-Therese HedqvistDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden. anntherese.hedqvist@lnu.se.
Catharina LindbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden.
Heidi HagermanDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden.
Ann SvenssonSchool of Business, Economics, and IT, Division of Informatics, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Mirjam EkstedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden.

Funding

Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse 20190249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough coordination of care and integrated care models aim to enhance patient satisfaction and perceived care quality, evidence regarding their practical implementation remains scarce. Understanding the nuances of collaboration across care providers to achieve effective coordination of care is imperative for seamless care integration. The aim of this study was to construct a grounded theory of how inter-organizational collaboration is performed to support coordination of care for patients with complex care needs.

methodsA qualitative design with a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied. In total, 86 participants with diverse backgrounds were recruited across multiple care settings, including hospitals, ambulance services, primary care centers, municipal home healthcare and home care services. The grounded theory was developed iteratively, based on a combination of observations and interviews, and using constant comparative analysis.

resultsCoordination of care, a complex process that occurs across interconnected healthcare organizations, is manifested as "Negotiating care in organizational borderlands." Care coordination evolves through a spectrum of inter-organizational collaboration, ranging from "Dividing care by disease-specific expertise" to "Establishing paths for collaboration" and ultimately "Co-constructing a comprehensive whole." These categories highlight the challenges of coordinating care across both professional and organizational boundaries. In the multifaceted healthcare landscape, effective care coordination occurs when healthcare professionals actively bridge the divides, leveraging their collective expertise. Importantly, organizational boundaries may serve a purpose and should not be dissolved to facilitate effective care coordination.

conclusionsThe key to effective care coordination lies in robust inter-organizational collaboration. Even when patients receive integrated care, healthcare professionals may have fragmented roles. This research emphasizes the importance of clearly defined lines of accountability, reinforcing mutual responsibility and facilitating bridging of professional and organizational boundaries. Healthcare professionals and policymakers can use these insights to effectively utilize inter-organizational collaboration in supporting care coordination for patients with complex care needs.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGrounded TheoryQualitative ResearchContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNegotiatingCare coordinationComplex care needsConstructivist grounded theoryIntegrated careInter-organizational collaboration

Identifiers

PMID39563335
PMCPMC11577764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.