Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563330›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Dynamics of recovery in psychosis, stigmatization, and microaggressions in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of service users' narratives.

Ploon Defourny, Nienke van Sambeek, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Floortje Scheepers, Marjolijn Heerings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient Journey Mapping in Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ploon Defourny *University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nienke van Sambeek *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062 PA, The Netherlands. vansambeek@eshpm.eur.nl.
Hester van de BovenkampErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062 PA, The Netherlands.
Floortje ScheepersDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn HeeringsErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062 PA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaborative care relationships form a key component of recovery-oriented mental healthcare, but can be disrupted if service users feel judged by professionals. Professionals can express stigmatizing attitudes through microaggressions, i.e. subtle forms of discrimination that have a negative cumulative effect. People with psychosis have been found to regularly experience overt and subtle forms of stigma in mental healthcare. This study aims to expand our understanding of the various forms and consequences of microaggression from a service user perspective.

methodsIn this qualitative study, we analysed narratives of people with psychosis purposefully selected from two collections of Dutch patient-authored stories ('Verhalenbank psychiatrie' and 'Patientervaringsverhalen'), including two books and nine transcripts of low-structured interviews. We performed thematic analysis to identify different forms of microaggression and additionally used narrative analysis to gain insight into the experienced consequences for recovery.

resultsWe identified three main forms of microaggression: microaggressions that dehumanize; microaggressions that disregard service users' perspectives; and microaggressions that convey hopelessness. Experienced consequences of microaggression included feelings of loneliness, powerlessness and uselessness, acts of despair, resistance or withdrawal, and disengagement from services. Microaggressions were found to create additional recovery needs that were often addressed outside mental healthcare.

conclusionOur findings illustrate the gap between ideals concerning collaborative care relationships and the everyday experiences of service users. Service users often experienced an absence of relationship-building in mental healthcare, with negative consequences for their recovery process. Our identification of different forms of microaggression can raise awareness and effectuate behavioural change in professionals and contribute to the emancipation of people with psychosis.

Indexed as

AggressionMental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarrationNetherlandsStereotypingCare relationshipMicroaggressionNarrative researchPersonal recoveryPerson-centred mental healthcareService users’ perspectiveStigma

Identifiers

PMID39563330
PMCPMC11577601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.