ReviewBMC oral health2024
Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment of C-shaped maxillary molars: case reports and review of literature.
Review in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endodontic Management of a C-Shaped Maxillary Second Molar With Five Canals: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The root canal systems of maxillary first molar (MFM) and maxillary second molar (MSM) variations represent a clinical challenge for endodontists, especially the prevalence of fused C-shaped roots. Having a thorough knowledge of root canal configuration is an extremely important point for a successful root canal treatment to avoid missing extra canals. The aim of this article was to present 2 cases of maxillary molar with an unusual C-shaped configuration diagnosed during root canal retreatment/treatment and conduct a literature review of the MFM and MSM anatomy. Case 1 reports that three separate palatal root canals fused into a C-shaped configuration in the MFM, which with an enamel pearl in the furcation, was classified as Type D and first reported in MFM. Case 2 reflects the fusion of all three buccal canals of the MSM into a C-shaped configuration that finally formed an apical foramen with a supernumerary tooth, and the configuration was Type B. Evaluation at an 18-month and a 9-month recall revealed that two patients were symptom-free after the conduct of a non-surgical retreatment/treatment, and the X-ray revealed normal periapical tissue. In addition, the thickness of the Schneiderian membrane due to odontogenic maxillary sinusitis returns to normal after an effective retreatment in case 1. These reports serve to remind endodontists of the importance and complexity of anatomical variations, which should always be considered when formulating an effective root canal treatment plan. The combined use of cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) and a dental operating microscope (DOM) will be profitable to locate and identify extra canals when a periapical radiograph shows signs of an unusual canal morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.