ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Does minimally invasive external fixation of proximal humerus fractures provide adequate stability? A biomechanical in vitro study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Analysis and optimization of inpatient cost structure for fracture patients under the implementation of the DRG policy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProximal humerus fractures are usually treated with rigid angle-stable plates or nails. As an alternative, semi-rigid, minimally invasive systems have been developed for supportive fixation. A new system uses this principle with 2.5 mm partially threaded pins and external fixation.
aimThis study aimed to compare the fracture stability of the fixator with an angular stable plate about whether the mechanical stability is sufficient for early postoperative mobilisation. MATERIALS AND
methodsHuman proximal humeri (paired, female, age ≥ 60, n = 8) were cut to a 3-part fracture and treated with an external fixator (Galaxy Shoulder, Orthofix) or an angular stable plate (Philos, DePuy Synthes). A physiological load was simulated in vitro based on a 45° abduction motion. The load level was continuously increased from 10 to 320 N within 10,000 cycles simulating the loads during rehabilitation. This was followed by another 10,000 cycles at 320 N for fatigue testing. Fracture motion was recorded with a 3D camera. Fracture stability was evaluated at a partial load of 160 N and 240 N (simulating loads during early mobilisation).
resultsThe fracture motion at the lateral aspect was significantly (p < 0.034) larger for the fixator compared to the plate both for axial and for shear movements, while at the medial aspects fracture motions were similar. Both fixation systems adequately stabilized the lateral tubercle fragment with no significant differences between fixation techniques. The migration of the fixator pins (1.1 ± 1.0 mm) and valgus rotation of the head fragment were minimal (3.1 ± 2.0°). The maximum load level of 320 N was reached by all plate constructs and 3 fixator constructs.
conclusionOur results suggest that the external fixator system allows early but gentle postoperative mobilisation. More aggressive rehabilitation measures should be postponed after the healing of the fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.