Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563261›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Definition of a measurement technique for hexapod circular smart fixators' perioperative assembly parameters and investigation of alignment and correlation with postoperative measurements: a retrospective cohort study.

Muharrem Kanar, Yusuf Sülek, Tolga Hayrettin Seymenoğlu, Raffi Armağan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muharrem KanarDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. dr.kanar@hotmail.com.
Yusuf SülekDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tolga Hayrettin SeymenoğluDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Raffi ArmağanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the assistance of smart fixator technologies, the correction of complex deformities has been facilitated; however, the accurate integration of specialized radiographs and measurements into the system remains the greatest disadvantage, necessitating specialized imaging and an experienced team. When inexperienced technicians and doctors perform these specialized postoperative radiographs, excessive exposure of the patient and team to radioactive rays exacerbates inadequacies in measurements and delays the correction of residual deformities due to angular and translational adjustments. In this study, we compared postoperative measurements with those taken peroperatively via fluoroscopy, hypothesizing that it reduces the exposure of the patient and team to radioactive rays, allows for more accurate and timely correction of deformities and assembly parameters, and reduces time and costs.

methodsBetween 2013 and 2022, 84 patients with bone deformities were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had bone deformities and were treated with computer-assisted circular external fixator systems (Ca-CEF). Assembly parameter measurements began to be corrected via artificial neural network software via peroperative fluoroscopy in 37 patients and postoperative radiography in 47 patients. The surgical duration for all patients, peroperative measurement values, and number of radiographs taken on postoperative day 1, week, and month until deformity correction were recorded.

resultsThe duration until deformity correction was shorter in patients who underwent postoperative measurements (mean 50.24 days) than in those who underwent peroperative measurements (mean 42.31 days), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.102). The surgical duration was significantly shorter in patients with postoperative measurements (mean of 130.37 min) than in those with peroperative measurements (mean of 155.88 min) (p = 0.045). For patients with postoperative measurements, 56.04 postoperative radiographs were taken. In contrast, patients with peroperative measurements had fewer radiographs totaling 28.7. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the fluoroscopy dose between patients with postoperative measurements (mean 18.54 mGy) and those with peroperative measurements (mean 22.22 mGy) (p = 0.105).

conclusionTo achieve accurate assembly parameters, minimizing X-ray exposure is crucial but can pose challenges. Our results showed that despite an average increase of 25 min in surgical duration, the time taken for deformity correction was shorter. Additionally, we obtained fewer postoperative radiographs, indicating reduced radiation exposure.

Indexed as

External FixatorsAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultComputer assistedDeformity correctionHexapodIntraoperative measurementMounting parameterPostoperative measurementTaylor spatial frame

Identifiers

PMID39563261
PMCPMC11577952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.