Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563246›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2024

Comparing cognitive impairment using MACFIMS in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amirreza Nasirzadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Melika Arab Bafrani, Aynaz Mohammadi, Hossein Bakhtiari-Dovvombaygi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Selective associations between cognitive practice effects and reactive balance adaptation in multiple sclerosis.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Assessing verbal and spatial memory via smartphone.Frontiers in digital health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amirreza NasirzadehDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Nursing Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-9923
Mohammad MohammadiSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mohammadi.moh4@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-5549
Melika Arab BafraniMultiple Sclerosis Research Center (MSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3983-5844
Aynaz MohammadiSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-1293
Hossein Bakhtiari-DovvombaygiStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hossein.bakhtiaridovvombaygi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-4898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting the central nervous system, leading to a range of symptoms that impact physical, psychiatric, and cognitive functions. Cognitive dysfunction is prevalent among patients with MS (pwMS), affecting at least 65% of patients, and includes deficits in processing speed, attention, learning, memory, and executive function. Despite the significant impact on daily life, cognitive impairment in MS patients is often underrecognized in clinical settings.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate cognitive function using the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS) battery among pwMS patients and healthy controls (HCs). A comprehensive search of the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted on January 2024 following the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research assessing the validity of the MACFIMS in adult MS patients. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using standardized tools, and statistical analyses were conducted using R4.2.3.

resultsEight studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 1,481 pwMS and 1,072 HCs. The meta-analysis revealed significant cognitive deficits in pwMS patients compared to HCs across all the MACFIMS subtests, including language, spatial processing, new learning and memory, processing speed, and executive function. Processing speed and working memory were the most affected domains, with 36% of pwMS showing impairment on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Subgroup analyses indicated that the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score significantly influenced cognitive impairment, while disease duration had a limited impact.

conclusionsThe MACFIMS effectively discriminates between pwMS patients and HCs, demonstrating its validity as a comprehensive cognitive assessment tool for MS. Routine cognitive screening, particularly for processing speed and working memory, is crucial for early detection and intervention. Future research should focus on the sensitivity and specificity of the MACFIMS across diverse MS subtypes and cultural contexts to enhance its global applicability in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisNeuropsychological TestsHumansCognitive impairmentMACFIMSMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39563246
PMCPMC11575216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.