ArticleJournal of telemedicine and telecare2025
A comprehensive evaluation tool to assess community capacity and readiness for virtual care implementation.
Article in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- SCOPE and FRAME: Context-Specific Tools for Virtual Care Service Delivery in Rural and Remote Communities.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- A Technology Selection Tool Applying Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Virtual Care Implementation.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- Virtual house calls: Using digital health technology for populations in assisted living.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadienArticle
- Standardizing Virtual Healthcare Deployment: Insights From the Implementation of Telerobotic Ultrasound to Bridge Healthcare Inequities in Rural and Remote Communities Across Canada.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThe rapid evolution and implementation of virtual care technologies for clinical use often exceeds the development of standardized implementation protocols, leading to gaps in the equitable and sustainable adoption of virtual care services, particularly in rural and remote areas. This paper introduces a comprehensive evaluation tool designed to assess community capacity and readiness for virtual care.MethodsThe development of the tool was informed by experiences from the Virtual Care and Robotics Program at the University of Saskatchewan. It involved a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach that engaged healthcare leaders, IT experts and community healthcare workers. This iterative process included defining evaluation categories, mapping evaluative domains and refining the tool into a user-friendly checklist manual.ResultsThe tool identifies three key domains for assessing readiness: clinical needs, technology infrastructure and human resources/workflows. It was piloted in the remote community of Fond du Lac, Saskatchewan, where it successfully qualified the community for implementing telerobotic ultrasound services. The tool facilitated local engagement and highlighted the community's specific needs and readiness, enhancing the implementation process.ConclusionThis evaluation tool contributes to bridging the gap between the rapid deployment of virtual care technologies and the need for comprehensive, standardized implementation protocols. It offers a structured, practical approach to assessing and enhancing community readiness for virtual care while promoting successful clinical implementation and equitable access to healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.