Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562837›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Quantifying spontaneous infant movements using state-space models.

E Passmore, A K L Kwong, J E Olsen, A L Eeles, J L Y Cheong, A J Spittle, G Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E PassmoreDevelopmental Imaging, MCRI, Melbourne, Australia.
A K L KwongDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
J E OlsenVictorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
A L EelesDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
J L Y CheongDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
A J SpittleDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
G BallDevelopmental Imaging, MCRI, Melbourne, Australia. gareth.ball@mcri.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1194497National Health and Medical Research Council 2016390Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation PG2019421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the first few months after birth, the typical emergence of spontaneous, fidgety general movements is associated with later developmental outcomes. In contrast, the absence of fidgety movements is a core feature of several neurodevelopmental and cognitive disorders. Currently, manual assessment of early infant movement patterns is time consuming and labour intensive, limiting its wider use. Recent advances in computer vision and deep learning have led to the emergence of pose estimation techniques, computational methods designed to locate and track body points from video without specialised equipment or markers, for movement tracking. In this study, we use automated markerless tracking of infant body parts to build statistical models of early movements. Using a dataset of infant movement videos (n = 486) from 330 infants we demonstrate that infant movement can be modelled as a sequence of eight motor states using autoregressive, state-space models. Each, motor state Is characterised by specific body part movements, the expression of which varies with age and differs in infants at high-risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcome.

Indexed as

MovementChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleModels, StatisticalVideo RecordingHidden Markov modelsHigh risk infantsMotor developmentNeurodevelopmentPose estimation

Identifiers

PMID39562837
PMCPMC11576873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.