ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2024
Sound innovations for biofabrication and tissue engineering.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustofluidic cryo-EM enables in situ particle manipulation for uniform, high-quality cryo-EM specimens.Science advances · 2026Article
- Soft microgel networks stabilize and extend nozzle-free water jets.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Acoustic virtual walls enable open, scalable, and programmable microfluidics.Science advances · 2026Article
- On-demand rotational manipulation of microparticles and zebrafish larvae via orthogonally phased BAW acoustofluidics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Integrated microfluidic biosensors: shaping the future of quantitative life sciences and on-chip molecular diagnostics.Lab on a chip · 2026Review
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Acoustic separation and isolation of viruses, small extracellular vesicles and other nanoscale bioparticles.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Space-time acoustofluidic tweezers for dynamic and selective manipulation of microparticles.Science advances · 2026Article
- SonoPIN enables precise, noninvasive, and efficient intracellular delivery of PROTACs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven design of engineered cilia enables hybrid operations in acoustic microrobots.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Strategies to control cellular spatial organization in microphysiological systems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- 3D biofabricated in vitro models as new approach methodologies for animal alternatives.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Precision acoustofluidics for high-throughput mechanobiology in suspension cells.Science advances · 2026Article
- Programmable acoustofluidic engineering for creating gradient biomaterials.Science advances · 2025Article
- Enhancing cancer therapyLab on a chip · 2025Article
- Novel High-Efficient Method to Generate Fragmented Nano- and Microfibers Enabling an Additive for Bio-Inks.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- High-stability flexible thin-film temperature sensor using MWCNTs-toughened Peano structure.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced biofabrication techniques can create tissue-like constructs that can be applied for reconstructive surgery or as in vitro three-dimensional (3D) models for disease modeling and drug screening. While various biofabrication techniques have recently been widely reviewed in the literature, acoustics-based technologies still need to be explored. The rapidly increasing number of publications in the past two decades exploring the application of acoustic technologies highlights the tremendous potential of these technologies. In this review, we contend that acoustics-based methods can address many limitations inherent in other biofabrication techniques due to their unique advantages: noncontact manipulation, biocompatibility, deep tissue penetrability, versatility, precision in-scaffold control, high-throughput capabilities, and the ability to assemble multilayered structures. We discuss the mechanisms by which acoustics directly dictate cell assembly across various biostructures and examine how the advent of novel acoustic technologies, along with their integration with traditional methods, offers innovative solutions for enhancing the functionality of organoids. Acoustic technologies are poised to address fundamental challenges in biofabrication and tissue engineering and show promise for advancing the field in the coming years.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.