Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562772›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Effects of balance training with visual input manipulations on balance performance and sensory integration in healthy young adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Jakob Ketterer, Albert Gollhofer, Steffen Ringhof, Lorenz Assländer, Urs Granacher, Dominic Gehring

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jakob KettererDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. jakob.ketterer@sport.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9197-3016
Albert GollhoferDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-6019
Steffen RinghofDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-1037
Lorenz AssländerDepartment of Sport Science, Human Performance Research Centre, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-9883
Urs GranacherDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-813X
Dominic GehringDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5577-8846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although balance training can improve balance across various populations, the underlying mechanisms, such as how balance training may alter sensory integration, remain unclear. This study examined the effects of balance training with visual input manipulations provided by virtual reality versus conventional balance training on measures of postural sway and sensory integration during balance control. Twenty-two healthy young adults were randomly allocated into a balance training group (BT) or a balance training with virtual reality group (BT + VR). The BT received traditional balance training, while the BT + VR additionally received visual manipulations during the 4-week balance training to elicit sensory conflicts. Static balance was measured in the form of center of pressure (COP) sway speed in trained (eyes open) and untrained (eyes closed) balance conditions. A model-based analysis quantified the sensory integration and feedback characteristics of the balance control mechanism. Herein, the visual weight quantifies the contribution of visual orientation information to balance while the proportional and derivative feedback loop-gains correct for deviations from the desired angular position and angular velocity, respectively. Significant main time effects were observed for the visual sensory contribution to balance (p = 0.002, [Formula: see text] = 0.41) and for the derivative feedback loop-gain (p = 0.011, [Formula: see text] = 0.29). Significant group-by-time interactions were observed for COP sway speed in the untrained task (p = 0.023, [Formula: see text] = 0.23) in favor of BT + VR and in the proportional feedback loop-gain, with reductions only in the BT + VR group (p = 0.043, [Formula: see text] = 0.2). BT + VR resulted in larger performance improvements compared with traditional BT in untrained tasks, most likely due to reduced reliance on visual information. This suggests that the systematic modulation of sensory inputs leads to enhanced capacity for motor adaptation in balance training.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleVirtual RealityVisual PerceptionYoung AdultBalance control modelFeedback loopRandomized controlled trialSensory reweightingSensory-to-motor transformationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39562772
PMCPMC11577058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.