ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of machine learning models for predicting depressive symptoms in knee osteoarthritis patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Machine Learning in Detecting Vessels Encapsulating Tumor Clusters in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Identification and Validation of Ferroptosis-Related Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in ARDS: A Bioinformatics and Experimental Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Depression Based on Polysomnographic Phenotypes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) combined with depressive symptoms is prevalent and leads to poor outcomes and significant financial burdens. However, practical tools for identifying at-risk patients remain limited. A robust prediction model is needed to address this gap. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model to identify KOA patients at risk of developing depressive symptoms. The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) data were used for model development and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) for external validation. 18 potential predictors were selected using LASSO regression. 4 machine learning models-logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network-were developed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. The most important features were extracted from the optimal model on external validation. A total of 469 individuals were included, with 70% used for training and 30% for testing. The random forest model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.928 in the test set, outperforming logistic regression (AUC 0.622), decision tree (AUC 0.611), and neural network models (AUC 0.868). External validation revealed an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.864-0.889) for the adjusted random forest model. Pain severity was the most significant predictor, followed by the five-time sit-to-stand test (FTSST) and sleep problems. This study is the first in China to apply a predictive model for depressive symptoms in KOA patients, offering a practical tool for early risk identification using routinely available data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.