Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562690›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025

The difference in gait pattern between adults with obesity and adults with a normal weight, assessed with 3D-4D gait analysis devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sofia Scataglini, Lisanne Dellaert, Lien Meeuwssen, Ellen Staeljanssens, Steven Truijen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofia Scataglini4D4ALL Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Center for Health and Technology (CHaT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium. sofia.scataglini@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-9522
Lisanne Dellaert4D4ALL Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Center for Health and Technology (CHaT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Lien Meeuwssen4D4ALL Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Center for Health and Technology (CHaT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Ellen Staeljanssens4D4ALL Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Center for Health and Technology (CHaT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Steven Truijen4D4ALL Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Center for Health and Technology (CHaT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify the difference in gait pattern between adults with obesity and adults with a normal bodyweight assessed with 3D-4D gait analysis (3D-4DGA) devices.

methodsArticles about the spatiotemporal parameters of adults with obesity compared with adults with a normal bodyweight using a 3DGA were sought on the 4th of October 2023 in three different databases (PubMed, Web of Science and IEEE). A total of 3371 articles were found: 2065 with PubMed, 1185 with Web of Science, and 121 with IEEE. The data was screened double-blind. Fourteen case control studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, and for all of them, the risk of bias was determined. Obesity was defined using the BMI, with a range of 30 kg/m² until 54.06 kg/m². Participants from both sexes (35% men and 65% women) were included, and they had an age range of 18-65 years. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottowa Scale (NOS), and the certainty of evidence was assessed with the Evidence-Based Richtlijn Ontwikkeling (EBRO). The meta-analysis showed a decrease in gait speed and cadence and an increase in stance phase, double stance, and step width. No significant difference was found regarding stride length. In the systematic review, step length, step rate, and swing phase were found to have decreased. Regarding the single stance, step time, CoM, and CoP, no conclusions could be drawn.

conclusionThere is a difference in gait parameters between adults with obesity and adults with a normal bodyweight. Namely, the gait speed, step rate, step length, swing phase is decreased in adults with obesity. However, there is an increase in step width, stance phase, and double stance phase.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisObesityAdultBody WeightFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.