Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562688›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025

Central obesity may account for most of the colorectal cancer risk linked to obesity: evidence from the UK Biobank prospective cohort.

Fatemeh Safizadeh, Marko Mandic, Ben Schöttker, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatemeh SafizadehDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-9499
Marko MandicDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-4521
Michael HoffmeisterDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-3197
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. h.brenner@dkfz-Heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-1572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral obesity commonly represented by body mass index (BMI) is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is unclear to what extent this association is accounted for by central obesity. We aimed to evaluate the associations between BMI, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist circumference (WC) with CRC risk and to investigate if and to what extent these associations are independent from each other.

methodsData from more than 500,000 male and female participants aged 40-69, recruited in the UK Biobank study between 2006 and 2010, were analyzed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fitted and hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 12.5 years, of 460,784 participants, 5,977 developed CRC. Multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CIs) per standard deviation increase of BMI, WHR, and WC were 1.10 (1.07-1.13), 1.18 (1.14-1.22), and 1.14 (1.11-1.18), respectively. After mutual adjustment, the association with CRC was substantially attenuated for BMI (1.04 (1.01-1.07)), and remained substantially stronger for WHR (1.15 (1.11-1.20)). Furthermore, WHR showed strong, statistically significant associations with CRC risk within all BMI categories, whereas associations of BMI with CRC risk were weak and not statistically significant within WHR categories. BMI was also not associated with CRC risk in women and with rectal cancer after mutual adjustment. Conversely, WHR was strongly associated with CRC risk in both sexes and with both colon and rectal cancer risk before and after adjustment for BMI. BMI and WC could not be mutually adjusted for due to their high correlation.

conclusionCentral obesity is a much stronger predictor of CRC and may account for most of the CRC risk linked to obesity. Our findings also emphasize the need for incorporating measures such as WHR alongside BMI in clinical practice to improve obesity prevention and management.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsObesity, AbdominalAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited KingdomWaist Circumference

Identifiers

PMID39562688
PMCPMC11999858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.