ArticleScientific reports2024
Thirteen year experience of vitrectomy and air tamponade for primary retinal detachment repair with clinical outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative demarcation lines in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: what en-face imaging reveals about visual outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- CURRENT STATUS AND DETERMINANTS OF POSTOPERATIVE VISUAL FUNCTION-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Multivariate Analysis.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with air tamponade for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and investigate the impact of vitreous cortex remnants (VCR) on surgical outcomes.
methodsA retrospective review of 900 patients treated for uncomplicated primary RRD between 2007 and 2020. Exclusion criteria included axial length > 26 mm, prior retinal surgery, giant retinal tear, PVR grade > B, and inadequate follow-up. Primary outcomes were retinal reattachment rate and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
resultsOf 900 patients, 397 met inclusion criteria. Primary reattachment rate was 88.4%, with significant BCVA improvement. Forty-six eyes experienced RRD recurrence. Complications included cataracts (38.8%), IOP rise (11.4%), and macular edema (8.3%). Better final BCVA was associated with preoperative macular non-involvement and absence of reinterventions. No significant association was found between RRD recurrence and various factors, including VCR removal.
conclusionAir tamponade is a safe and effective option for primary RRD treatment. It has no negative effect on the environment and creates less discomfort for patients. VCR removal did not significantly reduce RRD recurrence in the overall number of cases. Further research will help determine the role of VCR in RD recurrence and define in which cases their removal might be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.