ArticleScientific reports2024
Using machine learning to develop a stacking ensemble learning model for the CT radiomics classification of brain metastases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of acute severe cholecystitis using an attentive interpretable tabular network (TabNet)-based radiomics model and a stacking ensemble: a two-center study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting PD-L1 + CD8 - status in non-small cell lung cancer tissue from clinical indicators using machine learning.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Diffusion MRI Radiomics Predict Renal Function Decline in ADPKD.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Radiomics in Oncology: Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning ensemble meets clinical practice: developing a real-world risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome using super learner and scorecard approaches.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Regionally modulated radiomics analysis in PET/CT imaging: application to prognosis prediction of head and neck cancer.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- NEUROCOG-DysNet: a multi-scale cognitive feature engineering framework with stacking ensemble for improved dyslexia screening.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Lightweight deep learning for medical imaging using MobileNetV2-based brain pathology classification with Grad-CAM interpretability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a stacking model for personalized treatment of Crohn's disease: leveraging routine clinical features to forecast infliximab response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Brain tumor detection with real-world predictions in Jordan hospitals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced brain tumor segmentation in medical imaging using multi-modal multi-scale contextual aggregation and attention fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis based on ensemble machine learning model.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- From Preliminary Urinalysis to Decision Support: Machine Learning for UTI Prediction in Real-World Laboratory Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Enhancing drug repositioning: A multi-class ensemble model for drug-target interaction prediction with action type categorization.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the potential of machine-learning techniques in the automatic identification and classification of brain metastases from a radiomic perspective, aiming to improve the accuracy of tumor volume assessment for radiotherapy. By using various machine-learning algorithms, including random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, XGBoost, decision tree, artificial neural network, k-nearest neighbors, LightGBM, and CatBoost algorithms, a stacking ensemble model was developed to classify gross tumor volume (GTV), brainstem, and normal brain tissue based on radiomic features. Multiple evaluation metrics, including the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient, and the Youden index, were used to assess the model's performance. The stacked ensemble model integrated the strengths of the nine base models and consistently outperformed individual base models in classifying GTV (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.928), brainstem (AUC = 0.932), and normal brain tissue (AUC = 0.942). Among the base models, the support vector machine model demonstrated the best performance in the three classifications (AUC = 0.922, 0.909, and 0.928). The higher performance of the stacked ensemble model highlighted the low performance of other models, including the decision tree (AUC = 0.709, 0.706, 0.804) and k-nearest neighbors (AUC = 0.721, 0.663, 0.729) models in certain contexts, such as when faced with high-dimensional feature spaces. While machine learning shows significant promise in medical image analysis, relying solely on a single model may lead to suboptimal results. By combining the strengths of various algorithms, the stacking ensemble model offers a better solution for the classification of brain metastases based on radiomic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.