ArticleScientific reports2024
Fabrication and X-ray microtomography of sandwich-structured PEEK implants for skull defect repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Laboratory and Synchrotron X-Ray CT for Structural Analysis of PEEK Orthopedic Implants.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Use of Synchrotron Radiation in the Medical Sciences.Photon science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone defects pose a significant risk to human health. Medical polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is an excellent implant material for bone defect repair, but it faces the challenge of bone osteoconduction and osseointegration. Osteoconduction describes the process by which bone grows on the surface of the implant, while osseointegration is the stable anchoring of the implant achieved by direct contact between the bone and the implant. Bone defects repair depends on the implant's three-dimensional spatial structure, including pore size, porosity, and interconnections to a great extent. However, it is challenging to fabricate the porous structures to meet specific requirements and to characterize them without causing damage. In this study, we designed and fabricated sandwich-like PEEK implants mimicking the three-layer structures of the skull, whose defects imposes a significant burden on young adulthood and paediatric populations, and performed in-line phase-contrast synchrotron X-ray microtomography to non-destructively investigate the internal porous microstructures. The sandwich-like three-layer microstructure, comprising a dense layer, a loose layer and a dense layer in succession, exhibits structural similarity to that in a natural skull. This work demonstrated the fabrication of the sandwich-like PEEK implant that could potentially enhance osteoconduction and osseointegration. Furthermore, the interior structures and residual porogen sodium chloride particles were observed within the PEEK implant, which cannot be realized by other microscopic methods without destroying the sample. It highlights the advantages and potential of using synchrotron X-ray microtomography to analyze the structure of biomedical materials. This study provides theoretical guidance for the further design and fabrication of PEEK bone repair materials and will advance the clinical application of innovative bioactive bone repair materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.