Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562667›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Aeroponic approach for nondestructive root exudate collection and simulation of variable water stress trialed on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).

Heng-An Lin, Harrison R Coker, Sungkyu Park, Scott A Finlayson, Malak M Tfaily, Elek M Nagy, Steve Hague, Sanjay Antony-Babu, Julie A Howe, A Peyton Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heng-An Lin *Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-0901
Harrison R Coker *Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5302-3457
Sungkyu ParkDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-0055
Scott A FinlaysonDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Malak M TfailyDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3036-2833
Elek M NagyDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, USA.
Steve HagueDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, 107 Comer Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Sanjay Antony-BabuDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-620X
Julie A HoweDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7687-309X
A Peyton SmithDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX, 77845, USA. peyton.smith@ag.tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-9398

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-67019-31799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing root exudates during drought poses a serious challenge; sampling root exudates in soil is destructive to roots and leads to biased molecular analysis, along with microbial decomposition and exudate sorption to soil components. Hydroponic approaches are useful to overcome these problems but lack the utility to induce drought. Nondestructive sampling techniques are thus needed to analyze root exudates from the same plants over time in combination with highly controlled variable water/nutrient stress. The proposed aeroponic approach demonstrated that cotton could be grown to maturity in the aeroponic system, then a progressive drought treatment applied while simultaneously collecting root exudates from the same plants over time. Treatments of varying irrigation rates consisted of well-watered cotton (control) that was compared to cotton given progressive water stress (drought) and subsequent drought recovery for two weeks. Plants were entering flowering as drought treatment was applied. Nondestructive morphological measurements of plant productivity were made. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) was employed to analyze the molecular profile of exudates, whereas gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) was used to quantify abscisic acid (ABA). Plant development was highly responsive to reduced irrigation intervals with decreased canopy height, number of green leaves, biomass, and water content. As revealed by FT-ICR MS, the complexity and connectivity of unique biochemical transformation networks in response to drought was greatest at 9 days after treatment, where severe visual symptoms were observed. Overall, the aeroponic approach is a promising technology to simulate drought while sampling root exudates nondestructively, advancing root system research and plant-stress response mechanisms.

Indexed as

DehydrationGossypiumPlant RootsDroughtsHydroponicsPlant ExudatesSoilStress, PhysiologicalWaterPlant ExudatesSoilWaterAeroponicsCottonDroughtFT-ICR MSGossypium hirsutumRoot exudatesSampling method

Identifiers

PMID39562667
PMCPMC11576978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.