Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562648›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Placental T2* as a measure of placental function across field strength from 0.55T to 3T.

Megan Hall, Jordina Aviles Verdera, Daniel Cromb, Sara Neves Silva, Mary Rutherford, Serena J Counsell, Joseph V Hajnal, Lisa Story, Jana Hutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Contrast-Invariant Self-supervised Segmentation for Quantitative Placental MRI.Perinatal, preterm and paediatric image analysis (2025) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megan Hall *Department of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK. megan.hall@kcl.ac.uk.
Jordina Aviles Verdera *Department of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Daniel CrombDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Sara Neves SilvaDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Mary RutherfordDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Serena J CounsellDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Joseph V HajnalDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Lisa StoryDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.
Jana HutterDepartment of Early Life Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V002465/1MRC MR/V002465/1NIHR NIHR3016640UK Research and Innovation MR/T018119/Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT201526/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placental MRI is increasingly implemented in clinical obstetrics and research. Functional imaging, especially T2*, has been shown to vary across gestation and in pathology. Translation into the clinical arena has been slow because of time taken to mask the region of interest and owing to differences in T2* results depending on field strength. This paper contributes methodology to remove these barriers by utilising data from 0.55, 1.5 and 3T MRI to provide a fully automated segmentation tool; determining field strength dependency of placental assessment techniques; and deriving normal ranges for T2* by gestational age but independent of field strength. T2* datasets were acquired across field strengths. Automatic quantification including fully automatic masking was achieved and tested in 270 datasets across fields. Normal curves for quantitative placental mean T2*, volume and other derived measurements were obtained in 273 fetal MRI scans and z-scores calculated. The fully automatic segmentation achieved excellent quantification results (Dice scores of 0.807 at 3T, 0.796 at 1.5T and 0.815 at 0.55T.). Similar changes were seen between placental T2* and gestational age across all three field strengths (p < 0.05). Z-scores were generated. This study provides confidence in the translatability of T2* trends across field strengths in fetal imaging.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeMagnetic Resonance ImagingPlacentaAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyFetal imagingPlacental MRIT2* relaxometry

Identifiers

PMID39562648
PMCPMC11577033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.