Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562624›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Dose response effects of theacrine on cognitive performance and subsequent sleep.

Carissa L Gardiner, Jonathon Weakley, Josh Leota, Louise M Burke, Leonidas G Karagounis, Suzanna Russell, Rich D Johnston, Andrew Townshend, Shona L Halson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carissa L GardinerSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Jonathon WeakleySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia. Jonathon.Weakley@acu.edu.au.
Josh LeotaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Louise M BurkeExercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research (MMIHR), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Leonidas G KaragounisExercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research (MMIHR), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Suzanna RussellSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Rich D JohnstonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew TownshendSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Shona L HalsonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychostimulants can be employed as a countermeasure to cognitive declines resulting from insufficient sleep. Although caffeine is the most consumed psychostimulant, consumption can cause adverse side-effects, including sleep disturbance. Therefore, there is interest in identifying alternative supplements that improve cognitive performance without compromising subsequent sleep. Here we investigate the influence of the dose and timing of theacrine consumption on cognitive performance and subsequent sleep using conditions that replicate a low (100 mg) and high (400 mg) dose consumed in the morning (12 h prior to bedtime), afternoon (eight hours prior to bedtime), and evening (four hours prior to bedtime). We found no significant effect of the low or high theacrine dose on subsequent sleep although the high dose showed small non-significant effects on sleep efficiency and wake after sleep onset at each timepoint of consumption. However, consuming theacrine within eight hours of bedtime improved next-morning cognitive performance, with the 400 mg dose reducing the number of lapses on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task, although there were no significant effects on reaction time. Our findings provide initial scientific evidence suggesting that theacrine consumption may improve some aspects of next-morning cognitive performance but not others, with small non-significant effects on nighttime sleep.

Indexed as

CognitionDose-Response Relationship, DrugSleepAdultCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceQuinacrineReaction TimeYoung AdultCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsQuinacrineAdenosineAlertnessCaffeineSleep disruptionSleepinessVigilance

Identifiers

PMID39562624
PMCPMC11576848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.