ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimizing flexural strength of RC beams with recycled aggregates and CFRP using machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of different transverse reinforcement confinements on circular columns cast with recycled concrete aggregates and treated wastewater.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intelligent low carbon reinforced concrete beam design optimization via deep reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper investigates the flexural bearing behavior of reinforced concrete beams through experimental analysis and advanced machine learning predictive models. The primary problem centers around understanding how varying compositions of construction materials, particularly the inclusion of recycled aggregates and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), affect the structural performance of concrete beams. Eight beams, including those with natural aggregates, recycled aggregates, fly ash, and CFRP, were tested. The study employs state-of-the-art machine learning frameworks, including Random Forest Regressor (RFR), XGBoost (XGB), and LightGBM (LGBM). The formation of these models involved data acquisition from experiments, preprocessing of key input features (such as rebars area, cement portion, recycled and natural aggregate masses, silica fume, fly ash, compressive strength, and CFRP presence), model selection, and hyperparameter tuning using Pareto optimization. The models were then evaluated using performance metrics like Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.