Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562587›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Goffin's cockatoos use object mass but not balance cues when making object transport decisions.

Celestine Adelmant, Antonio J Osuna-Mascaró, Remco Folkertsma, Alice M I Auersperg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Celestine Adelmant *Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. celestine.adelmant01@gmail.com.
Antonio J Osuna-Mascaró *Messerli Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Remco FolkertsmaMesserli Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Alice M I AuerspergMesserli Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilising weight cues can improve the efficiency of foraging behaviours by providing information on nutritional value, material strength, and tool functionality. Attending to weight cues may also facilitate the optimisation of object transport. Though some animals' ability to assess weight cues has been determined, research into whether they can apply weight assessment during practical decision making is limited. In this study, we investigate whether Goffin's cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana) account for relative weight and unequal versus equal weight distribution when making object transport decisions, and whether sensitivity to these cues varies depending on transport mode. We conducted a series of binary choice experiments in which birds could choose to transport one of two identical, non-functional, equally rewarded objects differing only in overall weight (experiment 1) or weight balance (experiment 2) over a short distance. We found that in experiment 1, Goffin's cockatoos preferred to transport light objects over heavy objects and seemed to rely more on weight cues to inform decisions over time, whereas in experiment 2, weight balance cues were ignored. Contrary to our predictions, Goffin's cockatoos did not show increased preference for lighter or more balanced objects when employing higher energy transport modes (flight) compared to lower energy modes (walking). We suggest that this may be due to an insufficient difference in physical effort between transport modes due to the short distance travelled. These findings provide the first evidence of weight cues being considered to optimise object transport in birds.

Indexed as

CockatoosCuesDecision MakingAnimalsChoice BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID39562587
PMCPMC11576884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.