ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in dystonia: a scoping review.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical efficacy of neuromodulation in isolated dystonia: A systematic review of motor function improvement.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Neurological Disorders.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a non-invasive therapeutic technique that utilizes focused ultrasound waves to generate heat at specific tissue targets within the brain. This emerging technology holds promise for its precision and potential benefits in comparison to traditional surgical interventions. This investigation involves a scoping review, summarizing insights from various studies that explore the advantages, limitations, and outcomes associated with MRgFUS in the treatment of dystonia.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Data available on MRgFUS use in the management of different types of dystonia were extracted.
resultsThere is limited data available (n = 11). In the surveyed literature, MRgFUS has consistently shown clinical benefit in patients with dystonia. It is an emerging avenue of treatment and has its challenges.
conclusionThis scoping review highlighted the early but encouraging applications of MRgFUS in dystonia management. While data was limited, existing studies consistently demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. The non-invasive and precise nature of MRgFUS positions it as a promising avenue for further research, despite the challenges associated with its emergent status. This review sets the stage for future inquiries, emphasizing its potential as a valuable tool in dystonia treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39562491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.