Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562457›Full record

ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024

EEG Biomarkers for Autism: Rational, Support, and the Qualification Process.

Caitlin M Hudac, Sara Jane Webb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Visual and auditory attention in individuals with DYRK1A and SCN2A disruptive variants.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caitlin M HudacDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. chudac@mailbox.sc.edu.
Sara Jane WebbCenter on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. sara.webb@seattlechildrens.org.

Funding

The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical TrialsU19MH108206 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DZIURA, JAMES DAVID · 2015 to 2024
$68.8M
NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH108206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this chapter, we highlight the advantages, progress, and pending challenges of developing electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP) biomarkers for use in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We describe reasons why global efforts towards precision treatment in ASD are utilizing EEG indices to quantify biological mechanisms. We overview common sensory processing and attention biomarkers and provide translational examples examining the genetic etiology of autism across animal models and human subgroups. We describe human-specific social biomarkers related to face perception, a complex social cognitive process that may prove informative of autistic social behaviors. Lastly, we discuss outstanding considerations for quantifying EEG biomarkers, the challenges associated with rigor and reproducibility, contexts of future use, and propose opportunities for combinatory multidimensional biomarkers.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderBiomarkersElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsAnimalsAutistic DisorderBrainFacial RecognitionHumansSocial BehaviorBiomarkersBiomarkers of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)Electroencephalography (EEG)Event-related potentials (ERP)Face perceptionSensory processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.