ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024
Towards Biomarkers for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Contributions of Magnetoencephalography (MEG).
Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying autism spectrum disorders: a literature review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Auditory evoked neuromagnetic response latency is associated with language ability in preschoolers with an elevated likelihood of intellectual or developmental disability.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is no simple blood test for autism. Consequently, much attention has been paid to identifying noninvasive biomarkers using imaging (e.g., Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) and electrophysiological (e.g., electroencephalography, EEG and magnetoencephalography, MEG) methods. While, in general, these lack direct biological specificity, they can (in principle) provide a useful tool, or suite of tools, for diagnostic, prognostic, stratification, and response monitoring purposes.This chapter focuses on the pursuit of biomarkers using magnetoencephalography (MEG). While closely related to the more common electroencephalography (EEG), MEG offers some unique characteristics (such as improved spatial resolution, in combination with real-time temporal resolution and spectral discrimination), that might be considered impactful in the pursuit of biomarkers.Given the widely-acknowledged heterogeneity of ASD ("if you've seen one child with autism, then you've seen one child with autism"), the tide of research is perhaps shifting away from diagnostic biomarkers toward biomarkers that can help stratify patients according to some similarity in biological basis, etiology, or pathway. This approach, somewhat pragmatic, may be of benefit when designing and conducting clinical trials of putative therapeutics, or when optimally designing behavioral supports (when "therapy" may not be indicated).Ultimately, MEG-derived biomarkers, however advantageous in themselves, may likely find a place as reference in the prioritization and roll-out of candidate biomarkers established using other modalities, more accessible and available to the global community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.