Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562452›Full record

ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024

Neurophysiological Models in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Using Translational EEG Paradigms to Forecast Psychosis Risk and Resilience.

Holly K Hamilton, Daniel H Mathalon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Holly K HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daniel H MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. daniel.mathalon@ucsf.edu.

Funding

CSRD VA IK2 CX001878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several decades, there have been major research efforts to improve the identification of youth and young adults at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P). Among individuals identified as CHR-P based on clinical criteria, approximately 20% progress to full-blown psychosis over 2-3 years and 30% achieve remission. In more recent years, neurophysiological measures with established sensitivity to schizophrenia have gained traction in the study of CHR-P and its range of clinical outcomes, with the goal of identifying specific biomarkers that precede psychosis onset that 7 chapter, we review studies examining several translational electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP) measures, which have known sensitivity to schizophrenia and reflect abnormal sensory, perceptual, and cognitive processing of task stimuli, as predictors of future clinical outcomes in CHR-P individuals. We discuss the promise of these EEG/ERP biomarkers of psychosis risk, including their potential to provide (a) translational bridges between human studies and animal models focused on drug development for early psychosis, (b) target engagement measures for clinical trials, and (c) prognostic indicators that could enhance personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsPsychotic DisordersAnimalsBiomarkersBrainHumansModels, NeurologicalResilience, PsychologicalSchizophreniaTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiomarkersClinical high risk for psychosisEvent-related potentialsMismatch negativityP300SchizophreniaSensory processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.