Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562448›Full record

ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024

Functional Connectivity Biomarkers in Schizophrenia.

Amber M Howell, Alan Anticevic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amber M HowellYale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Alan AnticevicYale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. alan.anticevic@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a debilitating neuropsychiatric disorder that affects approximately 1% of the population and poses a major public health problem. Despite over 100 years of study, the treatment for schizophrenia remains limited, partially due to the lack of knowledge about the neural mechanisms of the illness and how they relate to symptoms. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH) have provided seven biomarker categories that indicate causes, risks, and treatment responses. However, no FDA-approved biomarkers exist for psychiatric conditions, including schizophrenia, highlighting the need for biomarker development. Over three decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based studies have identified patterns of abnormal brain function in schizophrenia. By using functional connectivity (FC) data, which gauges how brain regions interact over time, these studies have differentiated patient subgroups, predicted responses to antipsychotic medication, and correlated neural changes with symptoms. This suggests FC metrics could serve as promising biomarkers. Here, we present a selective review of studies leveraging MRI-derived FC to study neural alterations in schizophrenia, discuss how they align with FDA-NIH biomarkers, and outline the challenges and goals for developing FC biomarkers in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsConnectomeHumansAntipsychotic AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.