ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024
Modern Methods for Unraveling Cell- and Circuit-Level Mechanisms of Neurophysiological Biomarkers in Psychiatry.
Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methods for studying the mammalian brain in vivo have advanced dramatically in the past two decades. State-of-the-art optical and electrophysiological techniques allow direct recordings of the functional dynamics of thousands of neurons across distributed brain circuits with single-cell resolution. With transgenic tools, specific neuron types, pathways, and/or neurotransmitters can be targeted in user-determined brain areas for precise measurement and manipulation. In this chapter, we catalog these advancements. We emphasize that the impact of this methodological revolution on neuropsychiatry remains uncertain. This stems from the fact that these tools remain mostly limited to research in mice. And while translational paradigms are needed, recapitulations of human psychiatric disease states (e.g., schizophrenia) in animal models are inherently challenging to validate and may have limited utility in heterogeneous disease populations. Here we focus on an alternative strategy aimed at the study of neurophysiological biomarkers-the subject of this volume-translated to animal models, where precision neuroscience tools can be applied to provide molecular, cellular, and circuit-level insights and novel therapeutic targets. We summarize several examples of this approach throughout the chapter and emphasize the importance of careful experimental design and choice of dependent measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39562445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.