Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562440›Full record

ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024

Neural Circuitry-Related Biomarkers for Drug Development in Psychiatry: An Industry Perspective.

Patricio O'Donnell, Derek L Buhl, Jason Johannesen, Marijn Lijffijt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patricio O'DonnellTranslational Medicine, Alto Neuroscience, Mountain View, CA, USA. podonnell@altoneuroscience.com.
Derek L BuhlPrecision Medicine, Abbvie, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jason JohannesenTranslational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Marijn LijffijtSama Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development in psychiatry has been hampered by the lack of reliable ways to determine the neurobiological effects of the assets tested, difficulties in identifying patient subsets more amenable to benefit from a given asset, and issues with executing trials in a manner that would convincingly provide answers. An emerging idea in many companies is to validate tools to address changes in neural circuits by pharmacological tools as a key piece in quantifying the effects of our drugs. Here, we review past, present, and emerging approaches to capture the outcome of the modulation of brain circuits. The field is now ripe for implementing these approaches in drug development.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDrug DevelopmentBrainDrug IndustryHumansMental DisordersNerve NetPsychiatryBiomarkersEEGfMRIFunctional connectivityMismatch negativityNeurostimulationTMS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.