SynthesisNeurocritical care2025
Unsupervised Clustering in Neurocritical Care: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Multimodality Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Theory of arterial acceleration: implications for transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managing patients with acute brain injury in the neurocritical care (NCC) unit has become increasingly complex because of technological advances and increasing information derived from multiple data sources. Diverse data streams necessitate innovative approaches for clinicians to understand interactions between recorded variables. Unsupervised clustering integrates different data streams and could be supportive. Here, we provide a systematic review on the use of unsupervised clustering using NCC data. The primary objective was to provide an overview of clustering applications in NCC studies. As a secondary objective, we discuss considerations for future NCC studies. Databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for unsupervised clustering in acute brain injury studies including traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury published until March 13th 2024. We performed the systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We identified 18 studies that used unsupervised clustering in NCC. Predominantly, studies focused on patients with TBI (12 of 18 studies). Multiple research questions used a variety of resource data, including demographics, clinical- and monitoring data, of which intracranial pressure was most often included (8 of 18 studies). Studies also covered various clustering methods, both traditional methods (e.g., k-means) and advanced methods, which are able to retain the temporal aspect. Finally, unsupervised clustering identified novel phenotypes for clinical outcomes in 9 of 12 studies. Unsupervised clustering can be used to phenotype NCC patients, especially patients with TBI, in diverse disease stages and identify clusters that may be used for prognostication. Despite the need for validation studies, this methodology could help to improve outcome prediction models, diagnostics, and understanding of pathophysiology.Registration number: PROSPERO: CRD4202347097676.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.