Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562386›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2025

Unsupervised Clustering in Neurocritical Care: A Systematic Review.

Jeanette Tas, Verena Rass, Bogdan-Andrei Ianosi, Anna Heidbreder, Melanie Bergmann, Raimund Helbok

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Multimodality Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeanette Tas *Department of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria. tasjeanette@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8914-0960
Verena Rass *Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4241-5891
Bogdan-Andrei IanosiDepartment of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0705-4901
Anna HeidbrederDepartment of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-7619
Melanie BergmannDepartment of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0097-4396
Raimund HelbokDepartment of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-0145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing patients with acute brain injury in the neurocritical care (NCC) unit has become increasingly complex because of technological advances and increasing information derived from multiple data sources. Diverse data streams necessitate innovative approaches for clinicians to understand interactions between recorded variables. Unsupervised clustering integrates different data streams and could be supportive. Here, we provide a systematic review on the use of unsupervised clustering using NCC data. The primary objective was to provide an overview of clustering applications in NCC studies. As a secondary objective, we discuss considerations for future NCC studies. Databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for unsupervised clustering in acute brain injury studies including traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury published until  March 13th 2024. We performed the systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We identified 18 studies that used unsupervised clustering in NCC. Predominantly, studies focused on patients with TBI (12 of 18 studies). Multiple research questions used a variety of resource data, including demographics,  clinical- and monitoring data, of which intracranial pressure was most often included (8 of 18 studies). Studies also covered various clustering methods, both traditional methods (e.g., k-means) and advanced methods, which are able to retain the temporal aspect. Finally, unsupervised clustering identified novel phenotypes for clinical outcomes in 9 of 12 studies. Unsupervised clustering can be used to phenotype NCC patients, especially patients with TBI, in diverse disease stages and identify clusters that may be used for prognostication. Despite the need for validation studies, this methodology could help to improve outcome prediction models, diagnostics, and understanding of pathophysiology.Registration number: PROSPERO: CRD4202347097676.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticCritical CareCluster AnalysisHumansSubarachnoid HemorrhageHypoxic -ischemic brain injuryNeurocritical careNeuromonitoringStrokeTraumatic brain injuryUnsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID39562386
PMCPMC12137476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.