ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2024
Reclassification of two Nocardiopsis species using whole genome analysis.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-based reassessment ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome-Based Reassessment of Saccharothrix Phylogeny, with the Proposal of Two New Subspecies: Saccharothrix longispora subsp. Longispora subsp. nov. and Saccharothrix longispora subsp. Yanglingensis subsp. nov., comb. nov.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside theInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025Article
- Potential pitfalls in claiming novel taxa.iMeta · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study revisits the taxonomic classification of the genus Nocardiopsis through the application of advanced genome-based methodologies, representing a notable advancement beyond traditional approaches that primarily rely on 16S rRNA gene sequences and phenotypic traits. The advent of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and sophisticated bioinformatic tools has enabled a more precise framework for prokaryotic classification. However, many recognized species still lack complete genome sequences. In this study, we employed overall genome-related indices (OGRI), particularly Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH), to reassess the phylogenetic relationships within the genus. Comparative analyses of complete 16S rRNA sequences demonstrated high genetic similarity between N. umidischolae 66/93
Indexed as
Identifiers
39562378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.