Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562367›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2025

Left-sided portal hypertension: what an interventional radiologist can offer?

Ranjan Kumar Patel, Taraprasad Tripathy, Karamvir Chandel, Uday Kumar Marri, Suprabhat Giri, Hemanta Kumar Nayak, Manas Kumar Panigrahi, Bramhadatta Pattnaik, Tanmay Dutta, Sunita Gupta and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ranjan Kumar PatelDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India. ranjanair1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-5810
Taraprasad TripathyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Karamvir ChandelDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Uday Kumar MarriDepartment of Interventional Radiology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Suprabhat GiriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Hemanta Kumar NayakDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Manas Kumar PanigrahiDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Bramhadatta PattnaikDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Tanmay DuttaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Sunita GuptaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Suprava NaikDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left-sided portal hypertension (LPH) refers to increased splenic venous pressure caused by splenic vein stenosis or occlusion. Pancreatitis is the leading cause of LPH. Typically, LPH remains asymptomatic, but it can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage from ruptured fundal varices in about 10% of patients. Further, it may be complicated by hypersplenism. Interventional radiology plays an essential role in LPH patients with failed endoscopic treatment. Variceal embolization is an effective salvage measure in bleeding gastric varices, but it carries a risk of recurrence and worsening of hypersplenism. Considering the pathophysiology, splenic vein recanalization (SVR) appears to be the best treatment; nevertheless, its lower technical success rate limits its utility only to a subgroup of LPH patients. Partial splenic embolization (PSE), a non-surgical alternative to splenectomy, reduces the splenic volume and venous outflow, thereby lowering variceal pressure. PSE is technically easier, which may explain its widespread use. Nonetheless, PSE can be complicated by life-threatening sepsis and portal vein thrombosis. Despite all attempts, some LPH patients eventually require a splenectomy. Importantly, the choice of therapy requires multidisciplinary discussion and is often influenced by availability, expertise, and clinical context. This article discusses various interventional strategies for managing LPH with the available evidence. KEY POINTS: Question Pressure within the main portal vein is normal in left-sided portal hypertension; thus, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is ineffective. Findings Splenic vein stent placement can restore hepatopetal splenic blood flow and decompress splenic venous pressure. Clinical relevance Partial splenic embolization (PSE) is the most widely used interventional approach to manage left-sided portal hypertension-related complications.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticHypertension, PortalRadiography, InterventionalRadiology, InterventionalEsophageal and Gastric VaricesHumansSinistral Portal HypertensionSplenic VeinEmbolizationGastric varicesInterventional radiologyLeft-sided portal hypertension (LPH)Sinistral portal hypertension (SPH)

Identifiers

PMID39562367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.