ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Screening for Fabry disease in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Fabry Disease Screening in Patients with Idiopathic HCM or LVH: Data from the Multicentric Nationwide F-CHECK Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Phenotypic Diversity on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in a Han Family With Fabry Disease.CJC open · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of white matter microstructure damage and cognitive correlations by automated fibre quantification in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFabry disease (FD) usually mimics hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Decreased native T1 mapping and a unique late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging are specific imaging markers for FD. PURPOSE: Explore the performance of multiparametric CMR imaging in screening for FD in patients with a HCM phenotype. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective cohort of 602 patients with a HCM phenotype was assessed from April 2012 to December 2022. Participants underwent CMR imaging and genetic testing. FD diagnosis was according to genetic testing and enzyme-activity test of α-galactosidase A. Multiparameter CMR imaging included cardiac function, native T1 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV), T2 mapping, LGE, and myocardial strains. Diagnostic performance of CMR parameters in identifying FD from HCM was done by analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsFD prevalence was 1.8% (11 cases) in this cohort with HCM. Native T1 mapping was significantly lower in FD compared with HCM (FD vs. HCM: native T1 mapping: 1174.08 ± 60.60 vs. 1293.94 ± 55.86, p < 0.001). Ventricular function, mass, ventricular wall thickness, and strains did not show significant differences between the two groups. Binary logistic regression and analysis of ROC curves demonstrated myocardial native T1 mapping of the left ventricular basal slice had the best performance in screening for FD in patients with a HCM phenotype (cutoff: 1216 ms; AUC: 0.947; sensitivity: 91%; specificity: 90%).
conclusionNative T1 mapping is the best parameter for screening FD in a Chinese population with a HCM phenotype. KEY POINTS: Question The prevalence of Fabry Disease (FD) in the study population is unknown and the efficacy of cardiac MRI (CMR) parameter screening for FD needs validating. Findings We report the prevalence of FD among a Chinese hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohort and found T1 mapping is the best CMR parameter for screening FD. Clinical relevance Native T1 mapping is the best CMR parameter for screening FD in the HCM cohort, providing an effective method for rapid screening of FD in clinic, which may help identify patients for early treatment of FD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39562366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.