ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Supportive care strategies in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia in older adults: a national survey of Canadian hematologists.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Management of HMA-Related Myelosuppression During MDS Treatment in the Canadian Landscape.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are severe myeloid disorders associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Because of patient and disease factors, many older adults are treated as outpatients with less-intensive therapy. Optimal supportive care strategies to minimize bleeding and infectious complications in this patient population have not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a survey of Canadian hematologists to explore current practice in the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) and prophylactic antimicrobials in patients with MDS/AML treated with less-intensive therapy, and to evaluate equipoise for future trials. Survey items were generated through a combination of literature review and discussion with content experts. The survey was disseminated to 304 potential respondents with a response rate of 52%. Prophylactic platelet transfusions were used by 95%, while prophylactic TXA was used by 57%; the most frequent reason for not using TXA was uncertainty about benefit or harm. Use of prophylactic antimicrobials varied by chemotherapy regimen. If antimicrobial prophylaxis was used, the most frequently prescribed antibacterials were fluroquinolones (90%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (21%); the most commonly used antifungals were fluconazole (66%) and voriconazole (36%). The most common reason for not using prophylactic antimicrobials was insufficient evidence of benefit. Most respondents agreed that clinical trials are needed to define the use of TXA and prophylactic antimicrobials in this patient population. Among survey respondents, there was variation in the use of supportive care strategies to address bleeding and infection risk in older adults with MDS/AML. The results of this survey will help to inform clinical trials to assess the benefits and risks of these prophylactic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39562360What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.