ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Optimizing resources: low-dose nivolumab combinations in the management of relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low-dose PD-1 inhibition in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Investigational new drugs · 2025Pooled it
- PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta- and network meta-analysis.Translational oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to one-third of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are not responsive to first-line therapy or eventually relapse. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully employed to treat relapsed/refractory cHL (r/r cHL) but place patients at risk of financial toxicity. Early-phase trials and observational data suggest that low doses of ICIs may achieve similar results to those obtained with high doses. In this study, we report a single-center experience using low-dose nivolumab (LD-Nivo) in different combinations for r/r cHL, including monotherapy, LD-Nivo plus brentuximab vedotin (BV), and LD-Nivo plus chemotherapy. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of LD-nivo in patients with r/r cHL. We included 23 consecutive patients (median age 27 years; 57% female). LD-Nivo was prescribed in 40, 100, and 140 mg fixed doses Q2W. Survival analysis was performed employing the Kaplan-Meier method. 73% of patients achieved an overall response, 43% complete response, and 30% partial response. One-year overall survival was 94.4% (95% CI, 0.84-1), and the 1-year progression-free survival was 89.4% (95% CI, 0.77-1). OS and PFS were similar accross combinations. The median dose of nivolumab was 0.78 mg/kg (range, 0.62-1.11), and the median number of cycles until a response was documented was 6 (range, 2-9). During follow-up, 18 patients received transplantation (11 autologous, 6 allogeneic). No statistically significant differences in survival or response were detected between nivolumab combinations or doses. Adverse events were observed in 61% of the patients, with none grade 3-4. LD-Nivo demonstrated promising results in relapsed/refractory HL, highlighting its potential as a cost-effective treatment option. Further research is needed to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39562359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.