Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562355›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2025

Surgical outcomes and long-term survival of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy at high-volume centers in Korea and China: a two-centered retrospective analysis.

Sen Wang, Ji-Hyeon Park, Qingya Li, Yikai Shen, Jee-Sun Kim, Do-Joong Park, Seong-Ho Kong, Haisheng Fang, Hye-Seung Lee, Linjun Wang and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sen WangThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ji-Hyeon ParkDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Qingya LiThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yikai ShenThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jee-Sun KimDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do-Joong ParkDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong-Ho KongDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Haisheng FangThe Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hye-Seung LeeThe Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Linjun WangThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Diancai ZhangThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hao XuThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hyuk-Joon LeeDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Zekuan XuThe Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. xuzekuan@njmu.edu.cn.
Han-Kwang YangDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hkyang@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy is now widely used in East Asia and worldwide with different preferences and outcomes. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes and preferences between two high-volume gastric cancer centers in Korea and China.

methodsPatients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric cancer from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (NMUH) from 2017 to 2020 were enrolled in this study.

resultsA total of 1166 SNUH cases and 847 NMUH cases enrolled in this study. The overall complication rate of SNUH (14.49%) did not differ from that of NMUH after LADG or TLDG (12.28%). The anastomosis-related complications rate (2.74%) did not show a significant difference with that of NMUH (2.01%) either. The median postoperative hospital stay for SNUH (7,(7,10)) was shorter than that for NMUH (8,(7,9)). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of SNUH was not significantly different from that of NMUH.

conclusionThere was no significant difference in the overall complication rate, anastomosis-related complication rate, resected lymph nodes, and 5- year overall survival rate between SNUH and NMUH except for the postoperative stay. Both the LADG and TLDG achieved satisfactory short- and long-term outcomes when performed by surgeons with adequate experience.

Indexed as

GastrectomyHospitals, High-VolumeLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsStomach NeoplasmsAgedChinaFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsComplicationsLaparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomyLymph nodes metastasisTotally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID39562355
PMCPMC11717828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.