Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562341›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025

Interventional Radiology Management of Bone Metastasis Pain: Strategies and Techniques.

Guillaume Gravel, Alexis Nobileau, Axel Guth, François Mellot, Alexandre Roussel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guillaume GravelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France. g.gravel@hopital-foch.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0615-6538
Alexis NobileauDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Axel GuthDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
François MellotDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Alexandre RousselDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osseous metastases are common in cancer patients, and pain is one of the most frequent associated symptoms. The management of cancer-related pain is still problematic worldwide with 40 to 50% of patients still being undertreated. A significant proportion of cancer patients will require discontinuation of traditional analgesic treatments such as opioids due to unsuccessful pain relief or severe unmanageable toxicity and may, therefore, benefit from alternative treatments. Over the last few decades, several interventional radiology (IR) minimally invasive treatment options have been introduced into the cancer pain management toolbox and can be proposed to cancer patients. This article reviews the main IR treatment options for painful bone metastases which include vertebral augmentation, percutaneous osteosynthesis, tumoral ablation, electrochemotherapy, intra-arterial therapies, and percutaneous neurolysis.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCancer PainPain ManagementRadiography, InterventionalRadiology, InterventionalHumansBoneInterventional RadiologyMetastasesPain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.