Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562333›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

Exploring the development of safety culture among physicians with text mining of patient safety reports: a retrospective study.

Daisuke Koike, Masahiro Ito, Akihiko Horiguchi, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Atsuhiko Ota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daisuke KoikeDepartment of Public Health, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8629-0165
Masahiro ItoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 454-8509, Japan.
Akihiko HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 454-8509, Japan.
Hiroshi YatsuyaDepartment of Public Health and Health Systems, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan.
Atsuhiko OtaDepartment of Public Health, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety culture development is essential for patient safety in healthcare institution. Perceptions of patient safety and cultural changes are reflected in patient safety reports; however, they were rarely investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the perception of physicians and to explore the development of safety culture using quantitative content analysis for patient safety reports.

methodsA retrospective analysis of free descriptions of harmful patient safety reports submitted by physicians was performed. Natural language processing and text analysis were conducted using the "KH Coder." A co-occurrence analysis was performed in each period to identify and analyze the safety concepts. The study period was grouped into three for comparison.

resultsThe patient safety reports from physicians were collected between April 2004 and March 2020. Of these, 3351 reports were harmful: 839 reports were included in period 1, 1016 reports in period 2, and 1496 reports in period 3. Natural language processing identified 316 307 words in the free descriptions of 3351 reports. We identified seven concepts from the cluster in co-occurrence analysis as follows: "explanation of adverse event to patients and families," "central venous catheter," "intraoperative procedure and injury," "minimally invasive surgery," "life-threatening events," "blood loss," and "medical emergency team and critical care." These seven concepts showed significant differences among the three periods, except for "blood loss." The "explanation of adverse event to patients and families" decreased in proportion from 11.3% to 8.8% (P < .05). The "central venous catheter" decreased from 17.3% to 11.3% (P < .01). Meanwhile, "minimally invasive surgeries" and "intraoperative procedures" increased from 3.9% to 12.9% (P < .01) and from 10.8% to 14.6% (P < .05), respectively. Focusing on patients' events, "life-threatening events" decreased from 13.0% to 8.1% (P < .01); however, "medical emergency teams and critical care" increased from 3.3% to 10.6% (P < .01).

conclusionFree description in patient safety reports is useful for evaluating the safety culture. Co-occurrence analysis revealed multiple concepts of physicians' perceptions. Quantitative content analysis revealed changes in perceptions and attitudes, and a disclosure policy of adverse events and the priority of patient care appeared with the development of safety culture.

Indexed as

Data MiningPatient SafetyPhysiciansSafety ManagementAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansMedical ErrorsNatural Language ProcessingOrganizational CultureRetrospective Studiesincident reportingpatient safetyquantitative content analysissafety culturetext mining

Identifiers

PMID39562333
PMCPMC11724187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.