Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562156›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2025

Cost-effectiveness analysis for multi adverse events of proton beam therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma in Japan.

Takaaki Yoshimura, Yasuhiro Morii, Honoka Tamori, Ryuki Kita, Takayuki Hashimoto, Hidefumi Aoyama, Katsuhiko Ogasawara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takaaki YoshimuraDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Yasuhiro MoriiDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Honoka TamoriCenter for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako 351-0197, Japan.
Ryuki KitaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Takayuki HashimotoGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Hidefumi AoyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-868, Japan.
Katsuhiko OgasawaraDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medulloblastomas are one of the most common malignant cancers of the central nervous system in children. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is expected to provide equivalent tumor control to photon therapy while reducing the various adverse events caused by irradiation. Few studies have considered the cost-effectiveness of PBT for pediatric medulloblastoma, considering the multiple adverse effects and reflecting on the latest treatment advancements. A cost-utility analysis of PBT for pediatric medulloblastoma was conducted in a Japanese setting and compared to conventional photon therapy. The analysis was conducted from the public healthcare payer's perspective, and direct costs for the treatment of radiation therapy and radiation-induced adverse events were included. A Markov model was used, and the health states of secondary cancer, hypothyroidism and hearing loss were defined as adverse events. The time horizon was the lifetime. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used as a measurement of cost-effectiveness, with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) used as an outcome. The costs were estimated from the national fee schedule, and the utility and transition probabilities were estimated from published literature. PBT incurred an additional 1387116 Japanese yen (JPY) and 1.56 QALYs to the comparator. The ICER was JPY 887053/QALY, indicating that PBT was cost-effective, based on the reference value of JPY 5 million/QALY used in the Japanese cost-effectiveness analysis. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the ICER ranged from JPY 284782/QALY to JPY 1918603/QALY as a result of deterministic sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that PBT was cost-effective, with a probability of 91.7%.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisMedulloblastomaProton TherapyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansJapanMaleMarkov ChainsQuality-Adjusted Life Yearsadverse eventscost-effectivenessmedulloblastomaproton beam therapy

Identifiers

PMID39562156
PMCPMC11753841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.