Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39562005›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Preclinical evaluation of antigen-sensitive B7-H3-targeting nanobody-based CAR-T cells in glioblastoma cautions for on-target, off-tumor toxicity.

Fien Meeus, Cyprine Neba Funeh, Robin Maximilian Awad, Katty Zeven, Dorien Autaers, Ann De Becker, Ivan Van Riet, Cleo Goyvaerts, Sandra Tuyaerts, Bart Neyns and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of nanobody‑based CAR‑T in tumor immunotherapy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fien MeeusTranslational Oncology Research Center (TORC), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy (LMCT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium fien.meeus@vub.be.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-2002
Cyprine Neba FunehDepartment of Medical Imaging (MIMA), Molecular Imaging and Therapy (MITH) research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Robin Maximilian AwadTranslational Oncology Research Center (TORC), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy (LMCT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Katty ZevenDepartment of Medical Imaging (MIMA), Molecular Imaging and Therapy (MITH) research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Dorien AutaersTranslational Oncology Research Center (TORC), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy (LMCT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ann De BeckerDepartment of Hematology, Cellular Therapy Laboratory, University Hospital Brussels, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ivan Van RietDepartment of Hematology, Cellular Therapy Laboratory, University Hospital Brussels, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Cleo GoyvaertsDepartment of Medical Imaging (MIMA), Molecular Imaging and Therapy (MITH) research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-7772
Sandra TuyaertsDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-8071
Bart NeynsDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Nick DevoogdtDepartment of Medical Imaging (MIMA), Molecular Imaging and Therapy (MITH) research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-4833
Yannick De VlaeminckTranslational Oncology Research Center (TORC), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy (LMCT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Karine BreckpotTranslational Oncology Research Center (TORC), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy (LMCT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma is the most common lethal primary brain tumor, urging evaluation of new treatment options. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting B7 homolog 3 (B7-H3) are promising because of the overexpression of B7-H3 on glioblastoma cells but not on healthy brain tissue. Nanobody-based (nano)CARs are gaining increasing attention as promising alternatives to classical single-chain variable fragment-based (scFv)CARs, because of their single-domain nature and low immunogenicity. Still, B7-H3 nanoCAR-T cells have not been extensively studied in glioblastoma.

methodsB7-H3 nanoCAR- and scFvCAR-T cells were developed and evaluated in human glioblastoma models. NanoCAR-T cells targeting an irrelevant antigen served as control. T cell activation, cytokine secretion and killing capacity were evaluated in vitro using ELISA, live cell imaging and flow cytometry. Antigen-specific killing was assessed by generating B7-H3 knock-out cells using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-genome editing. The tumor tracing capacity of the B7-H3 nanobody was first evaluated in vivo using nuclear imaging. Then, the therapeutic potential of the nanoCAR-T cells was evaluated in a xenograft glioblastoma model.

resultsWe showed that B7-H3 nanoCAR-T cells were most efficient in lysing B7-H3

conclusionsB7-H3 nanoCAR-T cells showed promise for glioblastoma therapy following in vitro characterization, but limiting in vivo toxicity was observed. Off-tumor recognition of healthy mouse tissue by the cross-reactive B7-H3 nanoCAR-T cells was identified as a potential cause for this toxicity, warranting caution when using highly sensitive nanoCAR-T cells, recognizing the low-level expression of B7-H3 on healthy tissue.

Indexed as

B7 AntigensGlioblastomaSingle-Domain AntibodiesAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMiceReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysB7 AntigensCD276 protein, humanReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSingle-Domain AntibodiesAdoptive cell therapy - ACTChimeric antigen receptor - CARImmunotherapySolid tumorT cell

Identifiers

PMID39562005
PMCPMC11575280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.