ReviewThe Science of the total environment2024
Towards the definition of treatment wetland pathogen log reduction credits.
Review in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A unit process log reduction database for water reuse practitioners.Water research X · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment wetlands have the potential to treat a range of water and wastewater pollutants while using less energy and chemicals than conventional treatment processes, making them a viable option for improving the sustainability of water treatment systems. However, water treatment systems used for water reuse must also be protective of human health. To date, the human health protection benefits of treatment wetlands have not been rigorously quantified in the context of current human health risk frameworks. This study presents a comprehensive review of the ability of treatment wetlands to provide reliable pathogen reduction to meet risk-based treatment targets for water reuse. Following an existing protocol for establishing log reduction credits, we systematically reviewed the documented pathogen reduction performance of major treatment wetland types in terms of core components of that protocol, including pathogen removal mechanisms, identification of target pathogens, and influencing factors. Results of the review point to design and operational conditions under which treatment wetlands could likely be credited with a log reduction value of approximately 0.5 or greater for virus, protozoa and bacteria. These conditions are specified in terms of preliminary operating envelopes, or design and operational parameter windows associated with optimal performance. Important caveats are noted, as are specific and tractable recommendations for future research and data collection efforts that would help refine operating envelopes and define log reduction credits for these promising water treatment technologies. As a resource to other practitioners, we have also included the detailed performance characterization database as Supplemental Information. This database includes a detailed tracking of log reduction values as well as design and operational parameters reported in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.