ArticleGenomics2024
A fundamental and theoretical framework for mutation interactions and epistasis.
Article in Genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Central Dogma Cycle and Network: A Model for Cell Memory.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many pathological conditions are a result of intragenic epistasis; however, there are ambiguities in current epistasis models. Herein, the new Mutation Interaction Spectrum model defines a discrete outcome, named a Mutation Interaction, for each double point mutation in a gene and its component single mutations. The model is a universal genetic model of all types of mutation interactions and their functional outcomes and is derived from digital logic, commonly used in electrical engineering. Mutation interactions are normally classified as positive and negative epistasis. The model logics unifies common genetic relationships into one model, normalizing biological nomenclature, and disambiguates them with the 16 possible logic-based interactions. The model was tested by assaying transcriptional activity induced by HIV-1 Tat protein, for a random sampling of 3429 double mutations and all 1615 single mutations. All possible types of logic were observed for the Tat mutation interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.