ReviewCancer science2025
Leveraging genome-wide association studies to better understand the etiology of cancers.
Review in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of combined lifestyle and genetic risk with incident head and neck cancer: a prospective study in the UK Biobank.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- PIBF1 (p.R405Q) germline variant identified in cancer susceptibility family impairs protein stability and function.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Establishing Best Practices for Clinical GWAS: Tackling Imputation and Data Quality Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Leveraging genome-wide association studies to better understand the etiology of cancers.Cancer science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) statistically assess the association between tens of millions of genetic variants in the whole genome and a phenotype of interest. Genome-wide association studies enable the elucidation of polygenic inheritance of cancer, in which myriad low-penetrance genetic variants collectively contribute to a substantial proportion of the heritable susceptibility. In addition to the robust genotype-phenotype associations provided by GWAS, combining GWAS data with functional genomic datasets or sophisticated statistical genetic methods unlocks deeper insights. Integrating genotype and molecular phenotyping data facilitates functional characterization of GWAS association signals through molecular quantitative trait loci mapping and transcriptome-wide association studies. Furthermore, aggregating genome-wide polygenic signals, including subthreshold associations, enables one to estimate genetic correlations across diverse phenotypes and helps in clinical risk predictions by evaluating polygenic risk scores. In this review, we begin by summarizing the rationale for GWAS of cancer, introduce recent methodological updates in the GWAS-derived downstream analyses, and demonstrate their applications to GWAS of cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.