Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39561776›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2025

DNA nicks in both leading and lagging strand templates can trigger break-induced replication.

Yuanlin Xu, Carl A Morrow, Yassine Laksir, Orla M Holt, Kezia Taylor, Costas Tsiappourdhi, Patrick Collins, Su Jia, Christos Andreadis, Matthew C Whitby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tuning mitotic recombination with patterned DNA nicks for precision mosaic analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. PARP1-mediated 5' flap dynamics facilitate Okazaki fragment maturation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Asymmetrical recognition and processing of double-strand breaks formed during DNA replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms and genomic implications of break-induced replication.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Emerging drivers of DNA repeat expansions.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuanlin XuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Carl A MorrowDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Yassine LaksirDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Orla M HoltDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Kezia TaylorDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Costas TsiappourdhiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Patrick CollinsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Su JiaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Christos AndreadisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Matthew C WhitbyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK. Electronic address: matthew.whitby@bioch.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encounters between replication forks and unrepaired DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) can generate both single-ended and double-ended double-strand breaks (seDSBs and deDSBs). seDSBs can be repaired by break-induced replication (BIR), which is a highly mutagenic pathway that is thought to be responsible for many of the mutations and genome rearrangements that drive cancer development. However, the frequency of BIR's deployment and its ability to be triggered by both leading and lagging template strand SSBs were unclear. Using site- and strand-specific SSBs generated by nicking enzymes, including CRISPR-Cas9 nickase (Cas9n), we demonstrate that leading and lagging template strand SSBs in fission yeast are typically converted into deDSBs that are repaired by homologous recombination. However, both types of SSBs can also trigger BIR, and the frequency of these events increases when fork convergence is delayed and the non-homologous end joining protein Ku70 is deleted.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA, FungalDNA ReplicationSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA End-Joining RepairDNA HelicasesDNA RepairHomologous RecombinationRecombinational DNA RepairDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA HelicasesRqh1 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinsbreak-induced replicationCRISPR-Cas9nDNA replicationdouble-strand breakFlp-nickhomologous recombinationreplication forkreplication fork collapsereplication restartsingle-strand break

Identifiers

PMID39561776
PMCPMC12095120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.