ArticleJournal of surgical education2025
Defining the Essential Leadership Skills for Surgical Residents Leading Inpatient Teams: A Modified Delphi Study.
Article in Journal of surgical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leading with Impact: Transformational Leadership Among Women Surgeons - A Qualitative Study.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLeadership is an important competency for surgical trainees but traditionally overlooked in residency programs. Existing leadership curricula are limited by a lack of standardized objectives and validated assessment tools. This project seeks to define the most essential leadership skills for surgical residents leading inpatient teams and to develop an instrument that can be used as a workplace-based assessment.
designWe surveyed the literature to compile a preliminary list of relevant leadership skills. We then recruited national experts in surgical resident leadership to participate in 2 rounds of a modified Delphi process. In the first round, panelists voted to keep, modify, or remove the preliminary items, or to add additional ones. Insufficient agreement to keep a skill necessitated revision. In the second round, panelists rated their agreement with revised items' inclusion, with consensus indicated by content validity index >0.75. Leadership behaviors were mapped onto a quality rating scale.
settingREDCap online forms.
participantsSixteen experts including senior surgeons, surgical educators/social psychologists, and advanced practice providers participated in both rounds of the Delphi process.
resultsThe preliminary list included 26 behaviors grouped into 9 domains. After the first round of the Delphi process, 18 items were modified, 3 were removed, 3 were added, and 2 domains were merged. After the second round, all 27 revised behaviors in 8 domains achieved consensus. We incorporated them into the Inpatient Leadership Assessment Device (I-LEAD).
conclusionsWe used a consensus of national experts to define essential leadership skills for surgical residents and created a workplace-based assessment tool. I-LEAD provides a shared mental model for residents and team members, and clear objectives for educators seeking to develop leadership curricula. These efforts align with current trends toward competency-based education and can underpin the establishment of formal leadership training programs for surgical residents on a wider scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.