Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39561400›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Community Testing Centers to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing Services in Urban Mozambique.

Júlia Sambo, Nádia Sitoe, Neuza Nguenha, Jorfélia Chilaúle, Phath Guambe, Denise Langa, Júlio Rafael, Chishamiso Mudenyanga, Nédio Mabunda, Osvaldo Loquiha and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Júlia SamboInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nádia SitoeInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Neuza NguenhaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Jorfélia ChilaúleInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Phath GuambeInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Denise LangaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Júlio RafaelInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Chishamiso MudenyangaClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nédio MabundaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.
Osvaldo LoquihaClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ilesh JaniInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional diagnostic systems struggled to meet the fluctuating demand for testing across the different waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the walkthrough (WT) approach in extending access to COVID-19 testing to high-risk populations traditionally underrepresented at health facilities (HFs) and to observe its impact on testing demand. An interventional study was implemented in markets (WT markets) and ports (WT ports) in Maputo City and Province, Mozambique. Demographic, epidemiological, and clinical data were collected for patients testing for COVID-19 in HFs and at WTs, and a nasal swab COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) was administered. Overall, testing rates at WTs were higher than those at HFs. At WTs, 4,452 of 4,457 participants were eligible and screened for COVID-19. Most participants were fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and had no symptoms or comorbidities (62.1% at WT markets and 87.9% at WT ports). During the baseline phase, the incidence testing rate of Ag-RDTs in intervention health facilities near the WTs was approximately one-fifth (P <0.001) of that in the control HFs located far from the WTs. In the control HFs, the incidence testing rate decreased significantly during the intervention period, whereas in intervention HFs, the incidence testing rate increased by approximately four times (P = 0.005). During times of low positivity rates and limited patient flow, the WT testing points may not yield the expected results in lowering the incidence testing rate within HFs. The WT may constitute an alternative approach to increasing the screening of infectious and noncommunicable diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultAgedChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiqueSARS-CoV-2Young Adult

Identifiers

PMID39561400
PMCPMC11965724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.