ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Community Testing Centers to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing Services in Urban Mozambique.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Operational Research to Support Rapid Evidence-Based Responses to Outbreaks: Learnings from COVID-19.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional diagnostic systems struggled to meet the fluctuating demand for testing across the different waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the walkthrough (WT) approach in extending access to COVID-19 testing to high-risk populations traditionally underrepresented at health facilities (HFs) and to observe its impact on testing demand. An interventional study was implemented in markets (WT markets) and ports (WT ports) in Maputo City and Province, Mozambique. Demographic, epidemiological, and clinical data were collected for patients testing for COVID-19 in HFs and at WTs, and a nasal swab COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) was administered. Overall, testing rates at WTs were higher than those at HFs. At WTs, 4,452 of 4,457 participants were eligible and screened for COVID-19. Most participants were fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and had no symptoms or comorbidities (62.1% at WT markets and 87.9% at WT ports). During the baseline phase, the incidence testing rate of Ag-RDTs in intervention health facilities near the WTs was approximately one-fifth (P <0.001) of that in the control HFs located far from the WTs. In the control HFs, the incidence testing rate decreased significantly during the intervention period, whereas in intervention HFs, the incidence testing rate increased by approximately four times (P = 0.005). During times of low positivity rates and limited patient flow, the WT testing points may not yield the expected results in lowering the incidence testing rate within HFs. The WT may constitute an alternative approach to increasing the screening of infectious and noncommunicable diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.