ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Microbiological and Clinical Features of Patients with Cellulitis in Tropical Australia: Disease Severity Assessment and Implications for Clinical Management.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Australian guidelines for the treatment of cellulitis are informed by data from temperate, metropolitan centers. It is uncertain if these guidelines are equally applicable in tropical Australia, where the population, access to healthcare, and array of potential pathogens are quite different. This retrospective study examined adults admitted to Cairns Hospital in tropical Queensland, Australia, who were treated with intravenous antibiotics for a principal diagnosis of cellulitis in 2019. The study aimed to describe the epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological findings in these cases and the resulting implications for patient management. There were 305 episodes of cellulitis; a potential pathogen was identified in 93/305 (30%), most commonly Staphylococcus aureus (45/93, 48%) or Group A Streptococcus (16/93, 17%). There was one case of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Initial treatment was most commonly with narrow spectrum β-lactam antibiotics with flucloxacillin prescribed in 170/305 (56%) and cefazolin prescribed in 74/305 (26%). Overall, 4/305 (1%) died or were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 30 days, 123/305 (40%) had an inpatient stay >48 hours, and 63/305 (21%) were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Every patient who subsequently died or required ICU admission had an elevated early warning score (EWS ≥3) on admission. An EWS ≥3 on admission also predicted an inpatient stay of >48 hours (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.7-6.0; P <0.001) and 30-day readmission (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.6; P = 0.01). The etiology of cellulitis in tropical Queensland, Australia, is very similar to that seen in temperate regions, enabling the use of standard management algorithms for patients with cellulitis in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.